You're looking at Less Wrong's discussion board. This includes all posts, including those that haven't been promoted to the front page yet. For more information, see About Less Wrong.

shminux comments on [SEQ RERUN] One Argument Against An Army - Less Wrong Discussion

6 Post author: MinibearRex 21 July 2011 07:09PM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Comments (3)

You are viewing a single comment's thread. Show more comments above.

Comment author: shminux 22 July 2011 09:28:24PM 2 points [-]

Thanks for the welcome. I understand that Hard Rationality is often not readily applicable and you are tempted to make do with what you have, such as in forensics.

The issue I have with this approach is that "the most effective means available" is not really effective, unless the issue is either clear-cut (shoelaces are either tied or untied) or not very important (what's the worst that can happen if wrongly reflected light makes you mistakenly believe that your shoelaces are tied?).

My concern (summarized in the last paragraph of my original comment) is that people naturally and subconsciously gravitate toward collecting evidence (comparatively easy) instead of building testable models (hard). This issue probably deserves a separate thread, unless it has already been discussed, in which case I'd appreciate a link.