You're looking at Less Wrong's discussion board. This includes all posts, including those that haven't been promoted to the front page yet. For more information, see About Less Wrong.

Manfred comments on Dungeons and Discourse implementation - Less Wrong Discussion

24 Post author: Yvain 24 July 2011 10:37AM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Comments (56)

You are viewing a single comment's thread.

Comment author: Manfred 24 July 2011 09:36:28PM 2 points [-]

Hey, finally! I would be interested in participating.

I love playing devil's advocate, so I'll be anything - in fact, if there is a class called Devil's Advocate, I'll play that.

Comment author: Emile 25 July 2011 08:04:10AM 4 points [-]

If there isn't, there should be - they can summon Maxwell's Demon, Laplace's Demon, or Descarte's Evil Demon.

Comment author: [deleted] 25 July 2011 03:20:41PM 4 points [-]

And they shouldn't get any damage for defending a belief they don't hold. (But also only receive half the XP if they win a debate.)

Comment author: Manfred 25 July 2011 08:29:14AM *  0 points [-]

There does not appear to be such a thing in the manual. Although that doesn't stop it very thoroughly, I'd rather play it the way Yvain intended - at first at least :D