You're looking at Less Wrong's discussion board. This includes all posts, including those that haven't been promoted to the front page yet. For more information, see About Less Wrong.

DanielLC comments on Bayesian justice - Less Wrong Discussion

18 Post author: gwern 26 July 2011 12:58AM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Comments (23)

You are viewing a single comment's thread. Show more comments above.

Comment author: DanielLC 26 July 2011 02:55:22AM 2 points [-]

The specific example I gave is more due to treating random variables as if they're independant. For example, you're as likely to be off either way on A, and you're as likely to be off either way on B, so for each of those, you in fact gave the correct probability, but you're more likely to be off the same way on both than the opposite ways, so you have to correct more when you use them together.

But yes. Bayes' theorem is always the answer.