The article in question interpreting the paper is written by someone who clearly did not accept global warming to begin with (adopting an astonishingly biased tone), and http://judicial-corruption.net/2011/07/climate-scientists-blow-gaping-hole-in-%E2%80%98nasa-data%E2%80%99-paper-by-ideologue-roy-spencer/ this for instance argues that the science in the paper is bad. I am not a climatologist, so have no means by which to assess this paper on my own, but when one paper is claimed to utterly destroy current models it might be best to be a little skeptical for a while.
EDIT: I don't think its a NASA study, by the way, it just uses NASA data.
A new peer reviewed article came out from NASA showing that the models used to predict temperature changes, and the ecological issues as a result of these changes, greatly differ from observed data.
News Article: http://news.yahoo.com/nasa-data-blow-gaping-hold-global-warming-alarmism-192334971.html
Actual Paper: http://www.mdpi.com/2072-4292/3/8/1603/pdf