Right, sorry. I had only read the news article at the time of making this post, which doesn't say any of the above. Edited to reflect this.
It is extremely overconfident to take a paper you haven't read and declare it overturns decades of scientific consensus.
A new peer reviewed article came out from NASA showing that the models used to predict temperature changes, and the ecological issues as a result of these changes, greatly differ from observed data.
News Article: http://news.yahoo.com/nasa-data-blow-gaping-hold-global-warming-alarmism-192334971.html
Actual Paper: http://www.mdpi.com/2072-4292/3/8/1603/pdf