You're looking at Less Wrong's discussion board. This includes all posts, including those that haven't been promoted to the front page yet. For more information, see About Less Wrong.

Raemon comments on Ethical dilemmas for paperclip maximizers - Less Wrong Discussion

11 Post author: CronoDAS 01 August 2011 05:31AM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Comments (24)

You are viewing a single comment's thread. Show more comments above.

Comment author: Raemon 04 August 2011 01:25:09AM 1 point [-]

So there presumably is a particular "ideal" paperclip size (i.e. you want it to be as small as possible while still capable of holding a few pieces of paper together. I get the sense that a clip that can hold three papers together has the same ethical weight as a clip that can hold 10 or 40?)

Comment author: Clippy 04 August 2011 04:36:01AM 1 point [-]

That's about right. The "true" ethically necessary number of sheets a paperclip needs to fasten is a complicated matter, but it's certainly less than 10. (There's a related fuzzy issue about how large a tolerance band around standard width paper is acceptable.)