You're looking at Less Wrong's discussion board. This includes all posts, including those that haven't been promoted to the front page yet. For more information, see About Less Wrong.

cousin_it comments on Leveling IRL - Less Wrong Discussion

33 Post author: cousin_it 05 August 2011 09:35PM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Comments (125)

You are viewing a single comment's thread. Show more comments above.

Comment author: cousin_it 05 August 2011 11:50:59PM 0 points [-]

Nice! Do you have any thoughts on the second question in the post?

Comment author: GuySrinivasan 06 August 2011 12:28:17AM 0 points [-]

I haven't thought about how to optimally set levels, or about e.g. xp as sublevels. I have thought some about the "merit badge" approach. Subcategories of Anna's 9 branches? And from my notes "Should badges have levels, like level 1: you can talk a good game, level 2: you've beaten others in contests, level 3: you are good enough to be a target for those trying to beat the experts, level 4: you are the current champion amongst level 3s." This makes sense for some things but not others - the ability to do 5 pushups for instance is good, but being able to do more pushups than everyone else may not be.

I think I would be less interested in obtaining some super-broad "Level 4!" with checkpoints than in embarking on a 3-month journey to achieve my "You have at some point demonstrated at least apprentice-level skill in novel estimation problems!" badge.