= 27d567bc2d48d9f40e9ccc20ea370b15)
David_Gerard comments on Attempt to explain Bayes without much maths, please review - Less Wrong Discussion
You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.
= 783df68a0f980790206b9ea87794c5b6)
Loading…= b715d02e85f7b3b4ae65ca3d3e450868)
Subscribe to RSS Feed
Powered by Reddit
= f037147d6e6c911a85753b9abdedda8d)
You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.
Comments (26)
I don't think I have either. Some variety of it was my starting point. And it's an eyecatching name, which may or may not be a feature (depending, I think, on how well I can justify it).
It is quite possible that I am just completely full of shit in this endeavour. It is also true that I could probably brazen my way through that.
As I attempt to level up in PM, I am becoming quite the non-fan of Derrida.