You're looking at Less Wrong's discussion board. This includes all posts, including those that haven't been promoted to the front page yet. For more information, see About Less Wrong.

AdeleneDawner comments on Leveling IRL - level 1 - Less Wrong Discussion

20 Post author: cousin_it 09 August 2011 05:12PM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Comments (91)

You are viewing a single comment's thread. Show more comments above.

Comment author: cousin_it 10 August 2011 06:59:48AM *  0 points [-]

Why is strength so much more unimportant than memorizing 250 words?

It's not more unimportant. The third rule was added because several people felt that the physical requirements were excessive enough to discourage them from leveling entirely, and I didn't feel comfortable scaling them back to something like "walk 30 minutes without stopping".

Comment author: Metus 10 August 2011 08:42:48AM 0 points [-]

That does not seem right. If you, arbitrarily, decide that some skills are optional, others not, you devalue those that are optional. The whole point of the leveling system is to encourage people to fill their gaps, in this case physical, handicaps aside. And the first thing of a journey of 1000 miles is the first step: Make the L1 requirement for sports easier, though "strength" is pretty easy already.

It would be maybe better to know how many levels you plan to make. If it is, say, 100, it may be better to start with the smallest step possible. If it is 10, then you are right in setting the requirements higher.

Comment author: cousin_it 10 August 2011 09:00:25AM *  1 point [-]

One of the persons interested in leveling cannot run at all.

Comment author: Metus 10 August 2011 06:10:17PM *  3 points [-]

This, then, is only a fault of your metric. If you want to measure endurance you can use different means of measurement as suggested in the other child post. Especially in the case of inability to walk you can measure endurance with a wheelchair. Running is just one of many options to measure endurance.

Comment author: AdeleneDawner 10 August 2011 01:32:03PM 2 points [-]

This is plausibly related to a coordination disability, though. I do okay at other measures of endurance that don't require coordination. My suggested solution is to have either multiple options at each level (run one mile or walk three miles without stopping) or use different exercises for the different benchmarks (run 1 mile for level 1, walk 10 miles for level 2) .