You're looking at Less Wrong's discussion board. This includes all posts, including those that haven't been promoted to the front page yet. For more information, see About Less Wrong.

Hyena comments on How likely is Peter Thiel's investment into seasteading to pay off? - Less Wrong Discussion

14 [deleted] 30 August 2011 04:54PM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Comments (140)

You are viewing a single comment's thread. Show more comments above.

Comment author: Hyena 01 September 2011 01:31:58AM 0 points [-]

Doesn't quite work. Once your ship is a stationary economic operation within the EEZ, the protection of your flag erodes quickly. In any case, the US would be free to impose on them. For example, they could raid the seastead and seize it if they find contraband (cf. drug interdictions). They'd still need to be 200 nautical miles offshore to be safe.

Comment author: jhuffman 01 September 2011 01:54:39AM 0 points [-]

Have you looked at their website at all? They say that they will be more than 200 nautical miles from any country, out of any EEZ.

Comment author: Hyena 01 September 2011 02:04:33AM 2 points [-]

Read my first paragraph. You can also read an overview of admiralty and maritime law re seasteads helpfully hosted by the institute. It's not pretty.

http://seasteading.org/files/research/law/Balloun%20-%20U.S.%20Law%20Enforcement%20Admiralty%20Jurisdiction%20Over%20Seasteads.pdf