You're looking at Less Wrong's discussion board. This includes all posts, including those that haven't been promoted to the front page yet. For more information, see About Less Wrong.

Owen_Richardson comments on Scientifically optimizing education: Hard problem, or solved problem? Introducing the Theory of Direct Instruction - Less Wrong Discussion

18 Post author: Owen_Richardson 31 August 2011 05:28AM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Comments (61)

You are viewing a single comment's thread. Show more comments above.

Comment author: Owen_Richardson 31 August 2011 11:11:03AM 10 points [-]

Ouch ouch ouch, but thank you for helping me.

I'll have to think about a good "1-3 sentence description of what DI is" (in terms of what you can do with it, or in terms of its internal structure, or...?) while I'm at work, but as for evidence, if I said:

"Look at those two graphs from Project Follow-Through, because the meta-analysis says this stark difference between DI and other models of education keeps showing up in experiments comparing them."

Is that at all useful?

Comment author: Vaniver 31 August 2011 01:55:13PM 6 points [-]

How about:

Direct Instruction is an educational theory which extensively used experiments during its creation, and seeks to explain educational concepts in a sensible and efficient way. The amount of experience individual teachers can acquire pales in comparison to the amount of experience curriculum-builders can acquire, which DI takes advantage of by giving teachers heavily researched, and thus effective, scripts and practices to follow. Experiments dramatically verify the superiority of DI over other instruction methods.

In three sentences, you can't explain anything about the method besides its inputs and its outputs, which is what other people are interested in. If they've got a use for your method, then they'll start asking about its moving parts.

Comment author: prase 31 August 2011 06:27:31PM 3 points [-]

That explains DI's origins, but doesn't say anything about how it looks like and how it is different from other approaches. (Why it is called Direct Instruction, after all?)

Comment author: Vaniver 31 August 2011 07:46:22PM 4 points [-]

Right- that's because I don't know anything about what it looks like and how it's different from other approaches. (I haven't dug any deeper than this article and wikipedia).