You're looking at Less Wrong's discussion board. This includes all posts, including those that haven't been promoted to the front page yet. For more information, see About Less Wrong.

NancyLebovitz comments on Scientifically optimizing education: Hard problem, or solved problem? Introducing the Theory of Direct Instruction - Less Wrong Discussion

18 Post author: Owen_Richardson 31 August 2011 05:28AM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Comments (61)

You are viewing a single comment's thread. Show more comments above.

Comment author: RichardKennaway 01 September 2011 04:26:03PM 0 points [-]

Mathematical proofs are something that I'm still struggling with in general (both constructing and understanding them). Let's take the relatively simple proof that sqrt(2) is irrational. The presentation is fairly typical: it's terse, no motivation for any step is provided, and the whole setup is confusing. Even worse, I don't even see how I can apply the idea of example cases to this proof. It's not a general property, so I can't look at other cases.

It's a particular property, which you can apply to other cases by substituting some other particularity -- for example, replace 2 by any other number throughout and see whether the proof still goes through. Doing this sort of thing will tell you how the proof works and why it works.

As an aspiring polyglot, I also picked up the French Michel Thomas course and will test it this week.

I'm interested in knowing how this goes. I've never got very far when learning other languages, although I have to say I'm not impressed by the Michel Thomas web site or the Amazon reviews. I suspect that his method would drive me up the wall.