You're looking at Less Wrong's discussion board. This includes all posts, including those that haven't been promoted to the front page yet. For more information, see About Less Wrong.

Eneasz comments on Another treatment of Direct Instruction getting more into the technical details of the theory - Less Wrong Discussion

-3 Post author: Owen_Richardson 02 September 2011 06:06AM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Article Navigation

Comments (33)

Comments (33)

You are viewing a single comment's thread. Show more comments above.

Comment author: Eneasz 02 September 2011 09:04:58PM 4 points [-]

If you can't instruct someone as to what DI is, it might not be living up to claims its a ground-breaking instructional process.

Comment author: Owen_Richardson 02 September 2011 10:45:46PM 0 points [-]

The best quick reply I can think of to that is another analogy I already made:

I am vaguely like a high school physics student claiming that physics is a vital tool for engineering impressive bridges, but unable to actually produce plans for something like the Akashi Kaikyou Bridge offhand myself.

So please avoid meta-judging this?

Powered by Reddit Powered by Reddit