I just wanted to point out that I thought the article was going a different direction than it ended up going based off of misinterpreting the word 'mad'. I thought that it was going to be about a study that showed some kind of persecution complex in the contrarian who was unable to derive joy from being proven right. Maybe it was just me affected this way, but that threw me off until the last paragraph or so.
I recommend John Hempton's blog post on how badly people judge seeming madmen in the case the conventional view has only conventional-wisdom support. I also like how he explains his research and conclusions in general.
the gist: