You're looking at Less Wrong's discussion board. This includes all posts, including those that haven't been promoted to the front page yet. For more information, see About Less Wrong.

jsalvatier comments on Free research help, editing and article downloads for LessWrong - Less Wrong Discussion

55 Post author: jsalvatier 06 September 2011 09:13PM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Article Navigation

Comments (439)
Tags: public_goods community research help help_desk

Comments (439)

You are viewing a single comment's thread. Show more comments above.

Comment author: jsalvatier 10 April 2012 11:20:22PM 3 points [-]

here it is.

Comment author: lukeprog 10 April 2012 11:49:40PM *  0 points [-]

Interesting quote:

Although ethical notions change with time and across societies, no doubt some notions and restraints are shared by all societies. These could be programmed into the intelligent machines and in this way they could be made to 'see' our morality. But as human morality changes, should the morality of the machines be made to follow? More generally, should we build human ethical and other inertias into intelligent machines? It would certainly be intolerable for us to be judged by values accepted in past times; so presumably we should wish the machines to follow our social mores as they change...

Comment author: lukeprog 10 April 2012 11:41:55PM 0 points [-]

Many, many thanks, sir!

Comment author: jsalvatier 11 April 2012 04:12:56AM 0 points [-]

Glad to be of service.

Powered by Reddit Powered by Reddit