You're looking at Less Wrong's discussion board. This includes all posts, including those that haven't been promoted to the front page yet. For more information, see About Less Wrong.

drethelin comments on Safety can be dangerous - Less Wrong Discussion

4 Post author: PhilGoetz 07 September 2011 05:24AM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Comments (35)

You are viewing a single comment's thread.

Comment author: drethelin 07 September 2011 05:44:08AM 1 point [-]

this is only relevant if you can give us data on the drugs that would kill thousands that the fda prevents from being marketed.

Comment author: PhilGoetz 07 September 2011 06:09:54AM *  4 points [-]

No - that would be relevant if I were claiming that the FDA should be abolished. Here, I'm only claiming that they do not, in fact, approve a drug if its expected benefits outweigh its expected costs. Approval appears to require something closer to a 10/1 benefit/cost ratio.

Comment author: drethelin 07 September 2011 06:16:22AM 2 points [-]

sorry, I was thrown off by your last sentence "Exercise for the reader: Find other cases where cautionary measures are more dangerous than nothing." Seems like a fairly explicit point about how the fda is worse than nothing.

Comment author: PhilGoetz 07 September 2011 11:42:44PM 1 point [-]

Oh. I see what you mean.