You're looking at Less Wrong's discussion board. This includes all posts, including those that haven't been promoted to the front page yet. For more information, see About Less Wrong.

Sniffnoy comments on Why do people commit mathematical mistakes? What are the mechanisms behind them? - Less Wrong Discussion

4 Post author: Raw_Power 07 September 2011 09:57PM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Comments (37)

You are viewing a single comment's thread. Show more comments above.

Comment author: Sniffnoy 08 September 2011 07:24:02AM 7 points [-]

(Also, a "dirty little secret" that I stumbled on as a kid and that helped me stay at the top of my class for a long, long time without ever having to make much of an effort: you can usually check your results by keeping an eye on "extra-mathematical" aspects; for instance the answer to one exercise will follow the same pattern as the answers to all the other exercises; if you've been getting round numbers, then the right answer is probably also a round number; unless maybe it's the last exercise in the set, the one that gives the top student the extra point. If it's a trig exercise, the right answer is probably a multiple of 15 or even 30 degrees. These "facts" make no sense in terms of actual math; and it's even possible that learning them was harmful for me and one of the things that curtailed my later math learning. But for a while they made for smooth sailing.)

I think the short term for this is metagaming. :)

Comment author: Raw_Power 08 September 2011 05:27:14PM 0 points [-]

Terence Tao would have said this is the difference between a "mathematical problem" and a "real life problem". Kinda like a "treasure hunt" compared to actual archeological activity: you know wits are going to be more important than brute-strength ugly methods... although IRL Brute Strength and ugly approximations are what you end up using the most.