You're looking at Less Wrong's discussion board. This includes all posts, including those that haven't been promoted to the front page yet. For more information, see About Less Wrong.

fubarobfusco comments on Optimal User-End Internet Security (Or, Rational Internet Browsing) - Less Wrong Discussion

1 [deleted] 09 September 2011 06:23PM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Comments (23)

You are viewing a single comment's thread. Show more comments above.

Comment author: fubarobfusco 10 September 2011 07:04:15AM 2 points [-]

Stay out of bad neighbourhoods.

Note that social preconceptions of what constitutes a "bad neighborhood" may be wrong. You may have heard that porn sites are bad neighborhoods; but nobody's getting viruses off abbywinters.com. In contrast, any site offering to give you smiley cursors and screensavers may as well be selling rusty needles in a back alley.

Only download software from people who have a reputation to lose.

Sadly, many reputation-bearing software vendors bundle security-harming crapware with their software anyway. It's an improvement over random piracy, though; and one bias that probably worsens people's security is the notion that if no system is perfectly secure, then they may as well not bother improving — a form of zero-risk bias, I suppose.

For that matter, speaking of reputation and risks, a few years back you could get a Windows system cracked by putting a music CD from a well-known music label in the drive. Users may have expected that a music CD was not software, which expectation proved false.

Something else to consider is that most users probably experience the sunk-cost fallacy, coupled with status-quo bias, when considering switching to different software (e.g. operating system or Web browser). Considering that there are significant security differences among these choices, cognitive biases may be keeping a lot of users on inferior software.