You're looking at Less Wrong's discussion board. This includes all posts, including those that haven't been promoted to the front page yet. For more information, see About Less Wrong.

arundelo comments on Optimal User-End Internet Security (Or, Rational Internet Browsing) - Less Wrong Discussion

1 [deleted] 09 September 2011 06:23PM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Comments (23)

You are viewing a single comment's thread. Show more comments above.

Comment author: arundelo 10 September 2011 08:27:12PM 2 points [-]

in real life, most basilisks are verbal, and won't kill you but instead drive you insane Lovecraft-style.

This reminds me of something Yvain said:

Sometimes I think about how much I take for granted my basic human mental safety mechanisms. One of my philosophy professors told a story about a student in her class who, upon studying radical Cartesian skepticism, went crazy doubting everything and had to be taken away to a hospital for a while for his own protection. I'm sure I've encountered philosophy stranger than that, and some of it I don't have an answer for, but I don't go insane for the simple reason that when I encounter a philosophical problem I can't solve I just shrug and say "Mmmm, that's interesting" and go back to my normal human life. And it's only been recently that I've realized some people can't do this - that I see people studying philosophy that's no longer even interesting to me, like determinism or reductionism[,] and having existential crises over it.

Comment author: Armok_GoB 10 September 2011 09:39:20PM 0 points [-]

Yes, very relevant. Just know that there's MUCH more potent stuff out there, even maliciously designed. Not really a lot of it thou, and the vast majority of stuff damaging enough to avoid it is in already known dangers like cults. Still, there is some really nasty stuff out there that can get around even extremely good defences.