You're looking at Less Wrong's discussion board. This includes all posts, including those that haven't been promoted to the front page yet. For more information, see About Less Wrong.

AspiringKnitter comments on Harry Potter and the Methods of Rationality discussion thread, part 9 - Less Wrong Discussion

10 Post author: Oscar_Cunningham 09 September 2011 01:29PM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Comments (718)

You are viewing a single comment's thread. Show more comments above.

Comment author: AspiringKnitter 22 December 2011 02:03:58AM 2 points [-]

That's ridiculous. It's ridiculous that the curse would be considered unblockable under those circumstances and ridiculous that I didn't think of that already.

And yet... it seems you're right. In fact, now I think it would make sense for wizards to use shields in duels.

Comment author: dlthomas 22 December 2011 02:34:13AM 1 point [-]

Assuming shields light enough to be practically carried could be thick enough to block it.

Comment author: sboo 21 January 2012 01:40:07AM 1 point [-]

harry carries around a small boulder as ring. the transfiguration could be finite incantem'd before battle. although quirrel did say that most magic battles are actually ambushes.

Comment author: AspiringKnitter 22 December 2011 04:43:40AM 1 point [-]

And someone could just cast evanesco on the shield, now that I think about it.