You're looking at Less Wrong's discussion board. This includes all posts, including those that haven't been promoted to the front page yet. For more information, see About Less Wrong.

NancyLebovitz comments on 9/11 as mindkiller - Less Wrong Discussion

12 Post author: NancyLebovitz 12 September 2011 05:44PM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Comments (111)

You are viewing a single comment's thread. Show more comments above.

Comment author: NancyLebovitz 12 September 2011 08:20:19PM 2 points [-]

Novalis' link is my favorite piece of immediately post-9/11 writing, but it's a view completely from the outside of the process.

My link is about what it looks like from the inside.

Comment author: lessdazed 12 September 2011 10:14:42PM *  12 points [-]

Fight Club was probably a better movie to watch to understand the people who attacked us than The Battle of Algiers. All the efforts to ascribe a meaning to the events – the terrorists hate our freedom, or they hate that we are supporting dictators in their region, or they hate that we are infidels, or they hate that we are engaged in wars of aggression against Muslims, or whatever – were responses to our need for meaning rather than to the events themselves.

Just as some say "they hate that we are supporting dictators in their region" and some say "they hate that we are infidels", Millman says "Fight Club was probably a better movie to watch to understand the people who attacked us than The Battle of Algiers."

Millman has a particular political position. From the inside, one's political position looks like just common sense, above the petty politics of trying to fit every event into a narrow world view, which is what the other sides do.

It is hard for him to see this as a political position because it identifies multiple other political positions, rather than just one (which would be a sure sign of it being political). This is analogous to the "don't be a dick" crowd's thinking they are (uniquely) above irrationality in a debate about religion in society, cue xkcd.

In general: if one thinks one has a unique, common sense, apolitical third way, one probably doesn't. It looks basically the same from the inside whether one is toked out in Berkeley or in church in Arkansas.

Comment author: satt 13 September 2011 01:19:43AM 13 points [-]

From the inside, one's political position looks like just common sense, above the petty politics of trying to fit every event into a narrow world view, which is what the other sides do.

"Ideologies are like accents. Other people have them, you just talk normal." — Matt Stoller

Comment author: wedrifid 13 September 2011 05:21:55PM 1 point [-]

"Ideologies are like accents. Other people have them, you just talk normal." — Matt Stoller

Which is a shame, really, because accents are awesome. I want one. Preferably Scottish.

Comment author: NancyLebovitz 13 September 2011 10:33:39AM 1 point [-]

It took a significant effort of will to realize that I pronounce water as though it has two r's. I say warter-- it's a Delaware/Philadelphia accent. And even though it looks very odd in print, it sounds completely normal to me. 'Wahter' (the way most people pronounce it, even though it also looks very odd in print) doesn't sound as wet to me.

Comment author: lessdazed 13 September 2011 11:47:39AM 2 points [-]

How about "comb"? How is that pronounced?

Comment author: NancyLebovitz 13 September 2011 11:53:53AM 2 points [-]

I pronounce the b. Is that the question? I didn't know there was more than one way to pronounce it.

Also, vase vs. vahse. I think of vase as normal and vahse as affected. I try to keep a grip and realise that people generally say vahse because they think it's normal, not because they're showing off, and the same for aahnt meaning aunt. In at least one dialect (sorry, I don't know which one), both vase and vahse are used, with vahse meaning a fancy vase.

Comment author: shokwave 13 September 2011 12:00:45PM 2 points [-]

I pronounce the b. Is that the question? I didn't know there was more than one way to pronounce it.

Wow! Here in Australia it's like 'home'. No b.

(That might be Australia though; we say water like "w-aww-tah")

Comment author: NancyLebovitz 13 September 2011 06:00:43PM 1 point [-]

I've checked more carefully. I do pronounce the b, but I think it's a softer/briefer b than I use to finish Bob.

Comment author: orielwen 13 September 2011 04:12:46PM 1 point [-]

Yes, I can tell you do, because you don't spell it 'vayse'.

Comment author: pedanterrific 13 September 2011 05:50:15PM 0 points [-]

Upvoted because I had to go back and reread to figure out what you were saying. ("I think of vase as normal and vahse as affected." I didn't even notice because I think of 'vayse' as normal as well.)