= 27d567bc2d48d9f40e9ccc20ea370b15)
gwern comments on 'An objective defense of Bayesianism' - Less Wrong Discussion
You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.
= 783df68a0f980790206b9ea87794c5b6)
Loading…= b715d02e85f7b3b4ae65ca3d3e450868)
Subscribe to RSS Feed
Powered by Reddit
= f037147d6e6c911a85753b9abdedda8d)
You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.
Comments (5)
I haven't read this either, but the second sounds like Cox's theorem in disguise.
From a quick glance it looks to be the same flavor but a different result. The assumptions they are making seem to be different from Cox's theorem.