You're looking at Less Wrong's discussion board. This includes all posts, including those that haven't been promoted to the front page yet. For more information, see About Less Wrong.

Unnamed comments on Which Fields Are Underserved? - Less Wrong Discussion

11 Post author: hegemonicon 15 September 2011 01:16PM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Comments (39)

You are viewing a single comment's thread. Show more comments above.

Comment author: Unnamed 15 September 2011 06:06:39PM 3 points [-]

The fact that an old not-very-technical book is still considered great doesn't necessarily mean that the field hasn't progressed, it could just mean that the book did a good job of presenting ideas that are still considered important today and that the book was important historically in the development of the field. Books which are recommended as an introduction to a field (often to non-specialists) don't need to contain the latest research results or in-depth data analysis.