You're looking at Less Wrong's discussion board. This includes all posts, including those that haven't been promoted to the front page yet. For more information, see About Less Wrong.

ZankerH comments on Bayesian Minesweeper - Less Wrong Discussion

2 Post author: ZankerH 20 September 2011 12:43AM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Comments (20)

You are viewing a single comment's thread. Show more comments above.

Comment author: ZankerH 20 September 2011 01:03:28AM 1 point [-]

It is, as you've already pointed out, a matter of perspective. A player (like me, I'm ashamed to admit) who considers minesweeper an instinct akin to breathing will be able to focus on the dilemma between taking a risk or stopping, if they reach a point where taking a risk is required to progress. Of course, a minesweeper addict capable of playing without shutting their mind off (wait, that's why I'm playing it in the first place!) will recognise the mine and population densities as prior probabilities, and try to workout the conditional probabilities, and how they're likely to impact the outcome.

Comment author: [deleted] 20 September 2011 01:09:08AM 5 points [-]

Makes sense. The title caused me to assume that there was going to be some surface-level Bayesian updating worked into the core gameplay mechanic and I guess I was surprised when there wasn't.