You're looking at Less Wrong's discussion board. This includes all posts, including those that haven't been promoted to the front page yet. For more information, see About Less Wrong.

potato comments on Can't Pursue the Art for its Own Sake? Really? - Less Wrong Discussion

0 Post author: potato 20 September 2011 02:09AM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Comments (14)

You are viewing a single comment's thread. Show more comments above.

Comment author: potato 20 September 2011 03:20:08AM *  0 points [-]

Well, sure, if there's something specific I'm trying to accomplish, my degree of success helps me rate my rationality, but if my goal is to be as rational as I can, then I can still use specific tasks to help me gauge how rational I am. If my goal is to be as rational as possible, without anything else to protect, there is still lots of time pressure on me, provided I don't think I am as a rational as possible already. The more inefficiently I use my time, the poorer my final conception of rationality will be when I die, or on the off chance that i become as rational as I ever will be, then it'll take longer to get there then if I had used my time more efficiently.

I agree that solving specific tasks besides becoming rational, is necessary for becoming more rational. I just don't see why being rational must be instrumental for solving the task successfully, rather than my success in solving the task be a guide to becoming more rational. Again, lets assume I care a lot about being as rational as possible, or understanding rationality as best I can.