You're looking at Less Wrong's discussion board. This includes all posts, including those that haven't been promoted to the front page yet. For more information, see About Less Wrong.

p4wnc6 comments on [LINK] Daniel Pink talks about Motivation - Less Wrong Discussion

2 [deleted] 22 September 2011 04:51PM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Comments (7)

You are viewing a single comment's thread. Show more comments above.

Comment author: p4wnc6 23 September 2011 06:21:14PM 1 point [-]

Yes, I see your point. It was strongly worded, I think I was just typing quickly and over-emphasized that. In my mind, I was lumping a lot of things together as 'book theory' but it is good to point out that for developing players, it's not good to devote too much time to memorizing anything, whether it's openings or solutions to chess puzzles.

What I mean about "intuitive play" being stifled early on is that one of the first things I was taught was that playing moves that "look good" or "seem right" is not the right way to learn. Very few people can be successful playing with this sort of intuition. Ironically, though, this is why many chess players list Mikhail Tal as their favorite world champion.. he frequently played by intuition and would specifically choose technically unsound positions just because they had much more complication, which just personally interested him more.