I'm curious as to why this is only at 3 upvotes. Do people feel that the content is too obvious? Irrelevant? Badly argued? (The mere 9 upvotes of my previous paper draft also felt a bit puzzling - after all the commentary about "LWers should publish in peer-reviewed journals", I would have expected more.)
I'm curious as to why this is only at 3 upvotes.
Pardon me. I confess I just hadn't got around to reading your paper yet. Because there is some element of reading papers that feels like work. And lesswrong often tends to occupy the 'procrastination' element of my schedule. I am likely to only read a large article or paper if brief comments in reply to the article catch my attention and I am prompted to catch up on the context to see if I agree.
I'll now remember to just upvote paper drafts on site because the act of writing papers is praiseworthy. (If i...
http://www.xuenay.net/Papers/CoalescingMinds.pdf
Like my other draft, this is for the special issue on mind uploading in the International Journal of Machine Consciousness. The deadline is Oct 1st, so any comments will have to be quick for me to take them into account.
This one is co-authored with Harri Valpola.
EDIT: Improved paper on the basis of feedback; see this comment for the changelog.