You're looking at Less Wrong's discussion board. This includes all posts, including those that haven't been promoted to the front page yet. For more information, see About Less Wrong.

ahartell comments on Don't ban chimp testing - Less Wrong Discussion

15 Post author: PhilGoetz 01 October 2011 05:17PM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Comments (105)

You are viewing a single comment's thread. Show more comments above.

Comment author: ahartell 01 October 2011 09:09:04PM *  0 points [-]

Right, that makes sense. I guess if something can suffer and notice it's suffering and wish it weren't suffering then it should be as morally valuable as a person...maybe.

But while some level of intelligence does seem to be necessary for an animal to suffer in a way we find morally compelling it does not follow that abusing the slightly less intelligent is at all justified.

I think dogs are "capable of suffering in a way I find morally compelling" though, and I would sacrifice probably a lot of dogs to save myself or another human. Is that just me being heartless?

There are possibly entities that are very intelligent but for which we would have little moral regard.

I mentioned that the hypothetical aliens would have brains that work just like ours, not that they would be just as intelligent.

Comment author: Jack 01 October 2011 09:12:03PM *  0 points [-]

Your method should be to figure out what it is about humans that makes them morally valuable to you and then see if those traits are found in the same degree elsewhere.

Comment author: ahartell 01 October 2011 09:13:35PM 0 points [-]

I agree.