You're looking at Less Wrong's discussion board. This includes all posts, including those that haven't been promoted to the front page yet. For more information, see About Less Wrong.

Emile comments on Don't ban chimp testing - Less Wrong Discussion

15 Post author: PhilGoetz 01 October 2011 05:17PM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Comments (105)

You are viewing a single comment's thread. Show more comments above.

Comment author: Emile 04 October 2011 07:49:07AM 1 point [-]

I'm a bit fuzzy about what counts as signalling and what doesn't, but I think it covers more cases than those involving conscious planning.

But anyway, I'd say you care about about animals because you're a kind person, but that humans tend to be kind mostly because evolutionarily it's been a benefit by facilitating cooperation and reciprocation. I don't know whether evolution just implemented "be kind to everything" instead of just humans because it took less lines of code (kindness to animals as spandrel), or whether kindness to animals was deliberately implemented because of it's signaling value (it may not be hard-coded, but just learnt as children).

(For what it's worth, I tend to save small bugs and throw them out of the window instead of killing them, which my wife would prefer. This device is convenient for safely and easily catching bugs, and observing them!)

Comment author: [deleted] 04 October 2011 08:02:19AM 0 points [-]

I have misunderstood your initial comment -- it sounded to me like you were saying humans don't really care about animals, but often find it desireable to signal that they do. Thanks for clarifying!