You're looking at Less Wrong's discussion board. This includes all posts, including those that haven't been promoted to the front page yet. For more information, see About Less Wrong.

wedrifid comments on [Funny] Even Clippy can be blamed on the use of non-Bayesian methods - Less Wrong Discussion

31 Post author: lukeprog 02 October 2011 07:40AM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Article Navigation

Comments (46)
Tags: bayes

Comments (46)

You are viewing a single comment's thread. Show more comments above.

Comment author: wedrifid 03 October 2011 02:35:49AM 13 points [-]

(A consistent effect. Comments about karma are powerful. People seem rather malleable.)

Comment author: [deleted] 03 October 2011 02:42:58AM 1 point [-]

This is a really good point, so I upvoted it!

Comment author: pedanterrific 03 October 2011 03:03:03AM *  -2 points [-]

This is a really bad point, so I downvoted it!

(We shall see whose karma-fu is stronger, Molybdenumblue! Bwahaha!)

Edit: Welp, guess that answers that.

Comment author: [deleted] 04 October 2011 12:59:19AM 2 points [-]

Aw, hugs.

Comment author: pedanterrific 04 October 2011 07:20:22PM *  0 points [-]

Thank you, I appreciate that. Although it's not like I didn't anticipate this exact response, I just thought it was funny enough to go through with anyway.

(Honestly I half-expected ArisKatsaris to show up, all don't tell me how to vote! etc wanky etc.)

Powered by Reddit Powered by Reddit