You're looking at Less Wrong's discussion board. This includes all posts, including those that haven't been promoted to the front page yet. For more information, see About Less Wrong.

AdeleneDawner comments on [Funny] Even Clippy can be blamed on the use of non-Bayesian methods - Less Wrong Discussion

31 Post author: lukeprog 02 October 2011 07:40AM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Comments (46)

You are viewing a single comment's thread. Show more comments above.

Comment author: AdeleneDawner 03 October 2011 03:13:11AM 5 points [-]

Decision fatigue may also play a role (after studying something complex the extra decision of whether to vote on it feels like work so we skip it).

This. Also after reading a more complex thing, it seems common that I'll forget to think about voting at all, since I'm distracted by thinking about the implications or who I might want to share it with or what other people have to say about it. Sometimes I remember to go back and vote, but I think most of the time I just don't, whereas with funny things the impulse to focus on the author and give them a reward in response seems to be automatic.