You're looking at Less Wrong's discussion board. This includes all posts, including those that haven't been promoted to the front page yet. For more information, see About Less Wrong.

wedrifid comments on [Funny] Even Clippy can be blamed on the use of non-Bayesian methods - Less Wrong Discussion

31 Post author: lukeprog 02 October 2011 07:40AM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Article Navigation

Comments (46)
Tags: bayes

Comments (46)

You are viewing a single comment's thread. Show more comments above.

Comment author: wedrifid 03 October 2011 10:48:52PM *  1 point [-]

If I think a comment should end up with a score of +2, too bad, I have no direct way of controlling that. The resulting score is a reflection of the community's votes, not something I try to game by altering my voting decision based on whether the score gets closer to +2.

Ok, but that's your self handicapping and I want no part of it myself.

My decision to vote shall be determined by whatever vote I predict has the best consequences.

Comment author: GuySrinivasan 04 October 2011 12:19:28AM 1 point [-]

Surely by whatever vote is recommended by the decision procedure you predict has the best consequences. ;)

Comment author: wedrifid 04 October 2011 12:59:30AM 1 point [-]

Surely by whatever vote is recommended by the decision procedure you predict has the best consequences. ;)

No, I meant what I said.

Powered by Reddit Powered by Reddit