You're looking at Less Wrong's discussion board. This includes all posts, including those that haven't been promoted to the front page yet. For more information, see About Less Wrong.

lavalamp comments on First, they must be convinced to play the game - Less Wrong Discussion

16 Post author: lavalamp 09 October 2011 04:52PM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Comments (56)

You are viewing a single comment's thread. Show more comments above.

Comment author: lavalamp 09 October 2011 11:25:00PM 1 point [-]

If your moral dilemma is between your parents dying and your using a bit of manipulation to keep them (potentially) alive and happy forever, and you are in doubt, maybe you should consider reexamining how cryonics fits into your personal utility function.

I thought about it, and you are right: my utility function values my parents' continued life no matter what their own utility function has to say on the matter.

Maybe I need to reexamine why manipulation seems to be rated so low in my utility function. I can't think of a single time when I've purposely and consciously manipulated someone. Surely, that can't be optimal if I'm expecting to pull off a large amount of manipulation here. If I'm going to accomplish this at all, it has to be premeditated and skillfully executed. Where can I ethically practice manipulating people?

Comment author: shminux 10 October 2011 12:00:23AM *  1 point [-]

We manipulate people all the time, our parents (and children) included. Guilt-tripping, appealing to God, to their sense of self-worth, you name it. They have done it to you, you have done it to them. The difference is that most of the time it is done subconsciously. It might be that doing it intentionally is too repugnant for you for whatever reasons. It is also possible that the actual amount of manipulation you may have to do is lower than you think, or that you might have to work over someone you care about less.

For example, in a hypothetical case that you would convince their pastor/rabbi/mullah into believing that God wants all his children to use all available technological and medical advances to extend their life (not such a far-fetched idea), and that cryonics is one of those advances, and he would preach it to the congregation one day, then you can rely on his word when explaining that you, personally, want to use it for yourself. From there it is not that large a leap to include the rest of your family into the picture.

Comment author: lavalamp 10 October 2011 12:15:51AM 4 points [-]

We manipulate people all the time, our parents (and children) included. Guilt-tripping, appealing to God, to their sense of self-worth, you name it.

Yeah, that's why I said "purposely and consciously".

One of my parents was guilt-tripped a lot by their mother, and as a consequence deliberately taught my siblings and I to identify and be immune to guilt-trips while we were very young (method: attempt to put us on ridiculous guilt trips, slowly reduce the ridiculousness over time. It was very effective). Maybe this explains why it feels evil to me...