= 27d567bc2d48d9f40e9ccc20ea370b15)
Tetronian comments on Life is Good, More Life is Better - Less Wrong Discussion
You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.
= 783df68a0f980790206b9ea87794c5b6)
Loading…= b715d02e85f7b3b4ae65ca3d3e450868)
Subscribe to RSS Feed
Powered by Reddit
= f037147d6e6c911a85753b9abdedda8d)
You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.
Comments (54)
I meant "some people would have to live with a lower food supply in the short term but food production will be strongly incentivized in the long term." Unfortunately, now that I think about it, "let's kill arbitrary group #27" might actually look more attractive in that situation.
If production levels of food can still be increased at a linear cost then we haven't come anywhere close to "population too high".
I agree, and that's why "let's kill people" actually does make more sense in that situation. My original "market prices" argument was bad.