You're looking at Less Wrong's discussion board. This includes all posts, including those that haven't been promoted to the front page yet. For more information, see About Less Wrong.

jhuffman comments on A signaling theory of class x politics interaction - Less Wrong Discussion

53 Post author: Yvain 17 October 2011 06:49PM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Comments (60)

You are viewing a single comment's thread.

Comment author: jhuffman 17 October 2011 08:01:18PM *  18 points [-]

I can cite myself as an example. When I was a teenager working in a lowly McJob I was proud to earn $.25 more than many of my co-workers. When I'd heard the minimum wage was being raised from $4.25 to $5.15 I was a bit resentful that everyone was going to earn the same, even though it also meant I would earn more. It seems to me though that last place aversion explains this just as well as the signalling explanation.

Comment author: torekp 18 October 2011 01:23:38AM *  9 points [-]

Agreed, with this note: last place doesn't normally mean last in the whole country. Each person has a smallish reference group. Moreover, wealth rankings are fuzzy (unless you define a precise metric, in which case they're artificial). You need to have a clear advantage over someone in order not to be effectively tied for last.

Comment author: Fergus_Mackinnon 17 October 2011 09:00:37PM 3 points [-]

The two don't have to be mutually exclusive, although finding the share of responsibility might be difficult.