You're looking at Less Wrong's discussion board. This includes all posts, including those that haven't been promoted to the front page yet. For more information, see About Less Wrong.

Normal_Anomaly comments on Students asked to defend AGI danger update in favor of AGI riskiness - Less Wrong Discussion

3 Post author: lukeprog 18 October 2011 05:24AM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Comments (38)

You are viewing a single comment's thread. Show more comments above.

Comment author: Normal_Anomaly 18 October 2011 09:07:34PM 5 points [-]

What would you want to do with the control groups? Teach them that AGI won't destroy the world? Not teach them anything in particular about AI? Teach them that invading aliens will destroy the world, or that the biblical End Times are near? Any of these would yield useful information. Which one(s) do you favor?

Comment author: lessdazed 18 October 2011 10:15:58PM *  1 point [-]

Not teach them anything in particular about AI? Teach them that...the biblical End Times are near?

I was specifically thinking of these exact two conditions, which is why I said "groups", for they are different in kind. The aliens example is even better than the supernatural end times one.

I thought of but rejected "Teach them that AGI won't destroy the world?" when I couldn't think of how to implement that neutrally. How would one do that?

Comment author: Normal_Anomaly 18 October 2011 11:35:05PM *  3 points [-]

I thought of but rejected "Teach them that AGI won't destroy the world?" when I couldn't think of how to implement that neutrally.

True. Most arguments against the AGI-apocalypse scenario are responses to arguments for it; it would be difficult to present only one side of the question.