You're looking at Less Wrong's discussion board. This includes all posts, including those that haven't been promoted to the front page yet. For more information, see About Less Wrong.

Resetting my perception of something

10 Post author: cousin_it 18 October 2011 11:24PM

The guy who taught me how to eat sushi a couple months ago explained that I should get a slice of ginger before trying a different kind of sushi in order to "reset my taste buds" (probably broscience) and feel the taste anew (it works). That's also the exact problem that programmers face when trying to design user interfaces: after looking at the thing for a long time, they grow blind to its shortcomings. A visual reset would come in handy. I imagine that resets could help in other areas too. Does anything like that exist? Cogsci majors, help!

Comments (13)

Comment author: Vladimir_Golovin 19 October 2011 07:01:18AM *  8 points [-]

In graphic arts, the fastest way to reset perception is the mirror trick -- just look at your work through the mirror, or, if you're in Photoshop, use Horizontal Flip.

However, the mirror trick never worked for me with user interfaces because the reading diagonal (what's the English term for this?) gets flipped, and various UI conventions such as the OK / Cancel button order get messed up.

For texts, just abstain from looking / editing / thinking about it for at least a few hours, or, ideally, days if you're not under a deadline. Unlike the mirror trick, this approach seems to be universal -- for me, it also worked for many things, including user interfaces and decisions in general.

Comment author: Nornagest 19 October 2011 12:38:20AM *  5 points [-]

There are a lot of tricks like this in various fields. One of the simplest ones I can think of comes from the visual arts: when you come to a stopping point, simply turn the paper (canvas, Photoshop workspace, etc.) upside down, and if any of it looks weird from the new perspective, fix that part.

Unfortunately that'd only work for the static parts of UI; I don't know of any better palate-cleanser for the interactive parts of the experience than simply setting the project down for a while and coming back once you've context-switched into something else.

Comment author: jsalvatier 19 October 2011 03:29:39AM 4 points [-]

Perhaps you could try randomly changing parts that aren't what you're focusing on, like drastically changing the color scheme.

Comment author: FiftyTwo 19 October 2011 11:26:20PM 1 point [-]

Or switch it all to a new font and size so the arrangements of text are different when you reread it.

Comment author: NancyLebovitz 19 October 2011 04:35:56PM 3 points [-]

A night's sleep can help.

Comment author: Manfred 19 October 2011 12:46:08AM *  3 points [-]

Time off is good for this - for example, when writing, I often set drafts aside for a few days before rewriting.

Maybe closely examining a similar product with a different interface would help?

Comment author: jsalvatier 19 October 2011 03:27:55AM 1 point [-]

Or maybe trying to mock up a design how you imagine someone else would do it? Perhaps a competitor?

Comment author: calcsam 18 October 2011 11:49:53PM 6 points [-]

This might sound obvious, but:

Spending time frequently with different groups of friends with different value systems, each of which (you believe) has an accurate map of different parts of the world.

My experience:

My rationalist friends help me inject more empiricism/anti-happy-death-spiral memes into my church experience; my church friends help me keep other memes like "non-smart people are still worthwhile," "actions perceived as demonstrating character and virtue aren't all just signalling," and of course the "no sex, no drugs" purity meme.

I am in favor of all of the preceding memes but tend to forget each of them over time if I spend too long in a community that doesn't observe them.

Comment author: atorm 19 October 2011 01:28:05PM 7 points [-]

I grew up a very religious child, and I kept the no-sex meme long after I stopped being religious. Can you explain why you value no-sex purity?

Comment author: [deleted] 19 October 2011 07:12:01AM *  2 points [-]
Comment author: eugman 19 October 2011 07:56:45PM 0 points [-]

Do you have any theory as to why?

Comment author: [deleted] 19 October 2011 08:27:10PM 2 points [-]

From the first link (NYT article "How Nonsense Sharpens the Intellect"):

The brain evolved to predict, and it does so by identifying patterns.

When those patterns break down — as when a hiker stumbles across an easy chair sitting deep in the woods, as if dropped from the sky — the brain gropes for something, anything that makes sense. It may retreat to a familiar ritual, like checking equipment. But it may also turn its attention outward, the researchers argue, and notice, say, a pattern in animal tracks that was previously hidden. The urge to find a coherent pattern makes it more likely that the brain will find one.

Comment author: eugman 20 October 2011 12:34:06AM 1 point [-]

Ah, sorry I checked out links 2 and 3 and thought they were all twitter links. Very interesting! Thank you for your patience.