You're looking at Less Wrong's discussion board. This includes all posts, including those that haven't been promoted to the front page yet. For more information, see About Less Wrong.

gwern comments on Social status & testosterone - Less Wrong Discussion

28 Post author: gwern 20 October 2011 02:05PM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Comments (38)

You are viewing a single comment's thread. Show more comments above.

Comment author: XFrequentist 20 October 2011 03:26:12PM *  5 points [-]

From your modafinil link:

Interestingly, there seem to be some groups for which modafinil does little or nothing, and this ineffectiveness may not be due to counterfeit product or poor self-monitoring, but genetics:

“…Two-time 100 mg modafinil potently improved vigor and well-being, and maintained baseline performance with respect to executive functioning and vigilant attention throughout sleep deprivation in Val/Val genotype subjects but was hardly effective in subjects with the Met/Met genotype.”

The genotype variation specifically refers to the Rs4680 SNP, which is one of the SNPs that services like 23andMe test for.

Crap, I'm Met/Met! Thanks for saving me some money though.

Comment author: gwern 20 October 2011 03:49:58PM 3 points [-]

You're welcome. You could get some and try anyway to see what happens - I've long wondered how reliable these SNP findings are.

Comment author: XFrequentist 20 October 2011 05:57:16PM *  3 points [-]

I'm curious too. I did my MSc thesis on pharmacogenomics (pdf), and am now generally skeptical of this sort of result. I'll have a closer look at the paper and make a decision. Any tips on procurement if the decision goes that way?

Comment author: knb 21 October 2011 04:52:11AM 1 point [-]

Google Adrafinil. It works very well for me. It is legal and unregulated in USA and some other places.

Comment author: gwern 20 October 2011 06:46:36PM 0 points [-]

Any tips on procurement if the decision goes that way?

Nothing that I haven't already written down or that a LWer shouldn't be able to figure out.

Comment author: MatthewBaker 20 August 2012 07:14:24PM 0 points [-]

mymodafinil.com

Comment author: gwern 20 August 2012 09:41:23PM 0 points [-]

I am well aware of that site, have received modafinil from it, and have even corresponded with the owner; ignorance of specific websites was not the point I was making.

Comment author: MatthewBaker 22 August 2012 05:27:08PM 0 points [-]

I just felt like the speed of my answer should still be of some benefit, and I wasn't aware that you had gained the knowledge of its existence in the month hence your previous comment.