You're looking at Less Wrong's discussion board. This includes all posts, including those that haven't been promoted to the front page yet. For more information, see About Less Wrong.

Normal_Anomaly comments on In favour of a selective CEV initial dynamic - Less Wrong Discussion

12 [deleted] 21 October 2011 05:33PM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Comments (110)

You are viewing a single comment's thread. Show more comments above.

Comment author: Normal_Anomaly 23 October 2011 03:23:19PM 3 points [-]

I agree with what you're saying here, that if my goal was to survive I would pick the Pope. Though I'm not sure how much I'd want to live in a world based off the Pope's EV. Also, I think the whole point is moot, because the FAI programmers don't have to pick a Schelling point. They can pick Universal, or a random sample, or call for volunteers, or call for volunteers with some screening test to get rid of sociopaths.

I think we can agree on what I said in the grandparent: the pope would be the biggest one-person schelling point, and it's not a good choice for initial dynamic.

Comment author: [deleted] 24 August 2012 06:26:40AM *  1 point [-]

I think we can agree on what I said in the grandparent: the pope would be the biggest one-person schelling point, and it's not a good choice for initial dynamic.

Actually it might not be that bad. The theology of the body thing they have going might however mess up transhumanist aspirations I have and that would suck. But otherwise I expect a world mostly free of disease and poverty with much longer (but perhaps finite) lifespans where Western traditional values are given a boost.

That's pretty close to utopia when considering most other outcomes. Certainly it would be a more pleasant place to live than Robin Hansons em world.

Comment author: Viliam_Bur 24 October 2011 07:01:32PM 1 point [-]

the pope would be the biggest one-person schelling point

Yes, exactly.

and it's not a good choice for initial dynamic

And therefore, choosing a Schelling point for morality as base of CEV is probably not as good idea as it may seem. Unless one believes that ten-person or hundred-person Schelling points for morality would bring dramatically different results.

(And this is basically what I was trying to express in the comment that got so many negative points. Pope could be a Schelling point, Dalai Lama could be a Schelling point... Eliezer Yudkowsky would be a Schelling point inside LW community, but not outside.)