You're looking at Less Wrong's discussion board. This includes all posts, including those that haven't been promoted to the front page yet. For more information, see About Less Wrong.

wedrifid comments on Practicing what you preach - Less Wrong Discussion

2 Post author: TwistingFingers 23 October 2011 06:12PM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Comments (294)

You are viewing a single comment's thread. Show more comments above.

Comment author: wedrifid 24 October 2011 01:26:02PM 6 points [-]

But the norm for rebuttal here should usually be DH4 or higher

Not everything need be a rebuttal.

Incidentally, people constrained to DH4 or higher are gameable by common social practice.

Comment author: fiddlemath 26 October 2011 07:04:26AM *  0 points [-]

Not everything need be a rebuttal.

Certainly, not every reply needs to be a rebuttal. But it usually is, here.

On the other hand, if you're going to rebut, and you think the other party is trying to argue honestly, your lower bound really should be around DH4 (counterargument) in a setting with many speakers. In a private setting, simply disagreeing (DH3) can be useful to just explain internal state. "I disagree with X, but I'm not sure why. Hm..." But it's logically rude to state simple disagreement as if it were an actual argument. :)