= 27d567bc2d48d9f40e9ccc20ea370b15)
JoshuaZ comments on Naming the Highest Virtue of Epistemic Rationality - Less Wrong Discussion
You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.
= 783df68a0f980790206b9ea87794c5b6)
Loading…= b715d02e85f7b3b4ae65ca3d3e450868)
Subscribe to RSS Feed
Powered by Reddit
= f037147d6e6c911a85753b9abdedda8d)
You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.
Comments (28)
No. This is wildly non-continuous. It also isn't proper. This is why specifying what your hypotheses are for your theorems is important.
good point.But I think I said it had to be proper. I've made that more explicit.