You're looking at Less Wrong's discussion board. This includes all posts, including those that haven't been promoted to the front page yet. For more information, see About Less Wrong.

Jordan comments on Whole Brain Emulation: Looking At Progress On C. elgans - Less Wrong Discussion

40 Post author: jkaufman 29 October 2011 03:21PM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Comments (79)

You are viewing a single comment's thread.

Comment author: Jordan 30 October 2011 06:54:16PM 3 points [-]

I was disappointed when I first looked into the C. elegans emulation progress. Now I'm not so sure it's a bad sign. It seems to me that at only 302 neurons the nervous system is probably far from the dominant system of the organism. Even with a perfect emulation of the neurons, it's not clear to me if the resulting model would be meaningful in any way. You would need to model the whole organism, and that seems very hard.

Contrast that with a mammal, where the brain is sophisticated enough to do things independently of feedback from the body, and where we can see these larges scale neural patterns with scanners. If we uploaded a mouse brain, presumably we could get a rough idea that the emulation was working without ever hooking it up to a virtual body.

Comment author: Douglas_Knight 31 October 2011 04:50:42AM 3 points [-]

The lobster stomach ganglion, 30 neurons, but a ton of synapses, might be better for since its input and output are probably cleaner.

Comment author: slarson 01 November 2011 09:25:03PM 1 point [-]

Modeling lobster stomach ganglion work is going on at Brandeis and what they are finding is important: http://www.pubmedcentral.nih.gov/articlerender.fcgi?artid=2913134&tool=pmcentrez&rendertype=abstract

Given the results they are finding, and building on their methods it is not inappropriate to start thinking one level up to c. elegans

Comment author: khafra 31 October 2011 12:06:43PM 0 points [-]

Also because there's fictional prior art?

Comment author: bogdanb 31 October 2011 02:59:08PM 2 points [-]

Maybe there’s fictional prior art because the lobster stomack might be better.

Comment author: ciphergoth 01 November 2011 08:02:21AM 2 points [-]

If you're talking about Charlie Stross's Lobsters, yes this was inspired by Henry Abarbanel's work. He ran around the office going "They're uploading lobsters in San Diego!"

Comment author: jkaufman 31 October 2011 11:46:01AM 1 point [-]

"You would need to model the whole organism, and that seems very hard."

There are only ~100 muscle cells. People are trying to model the the brain-body combination, but that doesn't sound unreasonably hard to me.

Comment author: [deleted] 02 November 2011 04:44:59AM 1 point [-]

You need more than just muscle cells to do a whole-body emulation here -- c, elegans has roughly 1000 cells all told (varies depending on sex; hermaphrodites have somewhat fewer, males somewhat more).