= 27d567bc2d48d9f40e9ccc20ea370b15)
thomblake comments on [LINK] Cracked on PitMK, Fundamental Attribution Error, Confimation Bias and More - Less Wrong Discussion
You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.
= 783df68a0f980790206b9ea87794c5b6)
Loading…= b715d02e85f7b3b4ae65ca3d3e450868)
Subscribe to RSS Feed
Powered by Reddit
= f037147d6e6c911a85753b9abdedda8d)
Comments (14)
What do you mean? Every section had links to relevant information, including journal articles and the notably well-sourced Wikipedia.
I was thinking more along the lines of something like this. Is that too high a standard for a Cracked article? Yes, it probably is.
I wasn't counting Wikipedia, but now that I think about it, yes, Wikipedia does count as a reasonably reputable source. Therefore, I will revise my original claim and simply say "I wish there were more citations."