You're looking at Less Wrong's discussion board. This includes all posts, including those that haven't been promoted to the front page yet. For more information, see About Less Wrong.

CarlShulman comments on Q&A with new Executive Director of Singularity Institute - Less Wrong Discussion

26 Post author: lukeprog 07 November 2011 04:58AM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Comments (177)

You are viewing a single comment's thread. Show more comments above.

Comment author: CarlShulman 15 November 2011 10:25:41PM 1 point [-]

What I'm afraid of is that a design will be shown to be safe, and then it turns out that the proof is wrong, or that the formalization of the notion of "safety" used by the proof is wrong.

Thanks for clarifying.

This kind of thing happens a lot in cryptography,

I agree.