ABC=Atomic, Biological, Chemical?
That's much better than CBRNE (Chem, Bio, Rad-Nuke, Explosive), which seems to be the common phrase.
I'm familiar with NBC, (nuclear, biological, chemical) for current catastrophic risk and GNR (genetics, nano, robotics) for possible future ones.
I have just received a survey questionnaire regarding future directions in EU (European Union) research funding, and thought it would be interesting to see how LessWrong would answer the main question:
Imagine that EU funding is available for one ambitious, visionary project extending beyond 2020.