You're looking at Less Wrong's discussion board. This includes all posts, including those that haven't been promoted to the front page yet. For more information, see About Less Wrong.

eridu comments on Transhumanism and Gender Relations - Less Wrong Discussion

7 [deleted] 11 November 2011 01:48AM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Comments (118)

You are viewing a single comment's thread. Show more comments above.

Comment author: [deleted] 12 April 2012 03:33:56PM *  0 points [-]

Because it's easier to get facts about what it's like to live in Germany if you aren't a German than it is to get facts about what it's like to be a woman in patriarchy if you aren't a woman.

To put it another way, until it's possible to print out and debug human connectionist networks and association maps, most of the knowledge about gendered oppression can only be obtained by listening to women.

This is, of course, something that men under patriarchy are loathe to do, which is why Less Wrong (a male-identified male-dominated community) insists that men are perfectly fine sources of feminist analysis.

Comment author: TimS 12 April 2012 04:04:13PM 0 points [-]

I certainly don't expect Bob to give more useful answers than Hans a majority of the time. When it changes from Hans & Bob to Alice & Bob, the percentage will fall further.

In short, your position is that men have no useful input, which is very different from saying that they seldom have useful input. Bob should never have become a professor of feminism, as you describe the issue.

Comment author: [deleted] 06 June 2012 03:40:31AM 0 points [-]

How seldom does seldom have to be before seldom becomes 'no'?