You're looking at Less Wrong's discussion board. This includes all posts, including those that haven't been promoted to the front page yet. For more information, see About Less Wrong.

jimrandomh comments on Why an Intelligence Explosion might be a Low-Priority Global Risk - Less Wrong Discussion

3 Post author: XiXiDu 14 November 2011 11:40AM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Article Navigation

Comments (94)
Tags: ai siai singularity

Comments (94)

You are viewing a single comment's thread. Show more comments above.

Comment author: jimrandomh 14 November 2011 03:26:03PM 1 point [-]

You won't explain because the explanation is a neighbor of a topic that you were once asked to shut up about, three years ago, because the conversation had gotten repetitive? I think that's being too deferential.

Comment author: wedrifid 14 November 2011 05:40:01PM *  4 points [-]

I think that's being too deferential.

You really interpreted the move as deferential? Or is that you being tactful?

Comment author: timtyler 14 November 2011 03:49:51PM *  1 point [-]

Thanks for that - but for now I'll continue to go with what the site's moderator said.

I am not refusing to explain - the explanation I would offer now is much the same as it was back then. Anyone interested can go and look at the topic that I was forbidden from further discussing.

Powered by Reddit Powered by Reddit