You're looking at Less Wrong's discussion board. This includes all posts, including those that haven't been promoted to the front page yet. For more information, see About Less Wrong.

JoshuaZ comments on Why an Intelligence Explosion might be a Low-Priority Global Risk - Less Wrong Discussion

3 Post author: XiXiDu 14 November 2011 11:40AM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Comments (94)

You are viewing a single comment's thread. Show more comments above.

Comment author: JoshuaZ 28 November 2011 07:50:57PM 0 points [-]

You are far more knowledgeable than me and a lot better at expressing possible problems with an intelligence explosion.

I don't know about that. The primary issue I've talked about limiting an intelligence explosion is computational complexity issues. That's a necessarily technical area. Moreover, almost all the major boundaries are conjectural. If P=NP in a practical way, than an intelligence explosion may be quite easy. There's also a major danger that in thinking/arguing that this is relevant, I may be engaging in motivated cognition in that there's an obvious bias to thinking that things close to one's own field are somehow relevant.