You're looking at Less Wrong's discussion board. This includes all posts, including those that haven't been promoted to the front page yet. For more information, see About Less Wrong.

gwern comments on Transcription and Summary of Nick Bostrom's Q&A - Less Wrong Discussion

37 [deleted] 17 November 2011 05:51PM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Comments (10)

You are viewing a single comment's thread.

Comment author: gwern 17 November 2011 08:16:39PM 5 points [-]

You might have heard of this guy EY about 5 years back who ran a series of role playing exercises...

He didn't actually say 'this guy eee why' did he?

Hans Morivick

Moravec

a sort of attruing (?) program

"a sort of Turing program"

Like if you’re doing Philosohpy, you can do Philosophy of X, or of Y, or of almost anything

sp

Also, not all the questions are bolded.

Comment author: Nornagest 17 November 2011 09:59:29PM 3 points [-]

Some more along those lines:

So there’s kind of a triggeral(?) sense...

Probably "trivial".

There is a less figurative science...

Probably "a less figurative sense".

how much more affective at social persuasion...

"Effective".

Comment author: DanielVarga 18 November 2011 04:36:12PM 1 point [-]

series problems -> serious problems