= 27d567bc2d48d9f40e9ccc20ea370b15)
JoshuaZ comments on [Link] New paper: "The quantum state cannot be interpreted statistically" - Less Wrong Discussion
You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.
= 783df68a0f980790206b9ea87794c5b6)
Loading…= b715d02e85f7b3b4ae65ca3d3e450868)
Subscribe to RSS Feed
Powered by Reddit
= f037147d6e6c911a85753b9abdedda8d)
You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.
Comments (27)
This result is much stronger than Bell's theorem. I don't understand all the details but it seems to apply in a much broader range of contexts. ETA: To be more clear, Bell's Theorem applies to entangled particles. This doesn't seem to require entanglement as long as there's not too much pathological behavior.